Opinion
Civil Action No. 00-1031 (JR)
April 25, 2002
ORDER
Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration does not raise "an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice." Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e); Anyanwutaku v. Moore, 151 F.3d 1053, 1057-58 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (internal citations omitted). It is this 25 day of April 2002,
ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion [#88] is denied.