Opinion
Submitted June 23, 1997
Decided September 23, 1997
Reported below, 235 A.D.2d 333.
Motion, insofar as Joseph Nakash seeks leave to appeal, dismissed upon the ground that he is not a party aggrieved. The June 21, 1996 Supreme Court order affirmed by the Appellate Division expressly provided that its declaration of the rights of the parties does not apply to Joseph Nakash because proceedings against him were stayed; motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made by the other appellants, denied.