Opinion
CASE NO: 8:10-cv-1541-T-26TBM.
October 5, 2010
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 29). After careful consideration of the motion and review of the applicable law, the Court finds that Defendants have failed to articulate any clear or manifest error, or any other conceivable ground, warranting reconsideration. That another district judge in the Middle of District of Florida decided to exercise discretion on a different record in a different manner, is of no precedential value to the case at hand. Defendants failed to mention that another judge in the Southern District of Florida found the first-to-file rule inapplicable in a case related to one of the cases cited to this Court in their motion. To the extent, Defendants claim difficulty in understanding this Court's prior order and/or assert typographical errors, the Court will enter an amended order forthwith. The Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 29) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on October 5, 2010.
See Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Pate, 2:10-cv-121-FtM-36DNF, docket 82, Exhibit A, citing Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Precision Drywall, Inc., 10-80457-CIV-Seitz/O'Sullivan (S.D. Fla. June 22, 2010).