From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Savings Trust Co. v. Shutack

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Dec 6, 1943
139 F.2d 371 (D.C. Cir. 1943)

Opinion

No. 8440.

Decided December 6, 1943.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Petition by the National Savings Trust Company and another, substituted trustees under deed in trust of Josiah S. Tyree, deceased, against Elizabeth Tyree Shutack and others for instructions as to the conversion of part of the capital stock of a corporation into debenture bonds for purpose of effecting income tax savings. From a judgment denying the petition, the petitioners appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

Mr. W.C. Sullivan, of Washington, D.C., for appellants.

Mr. George C. Gertman, of Washington, D.C., for infant appellees.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and MILLER and EDGERTON, Associate Justices.


In this case appellants, who are trustees under a deed in trust of the capital stock of J.S. Tyree, Chemist, Incorporated, filed their petition in the District Court, for instructions as to the conversion of part of the capital stock of the corporation into debenture bonds for the purpose of effecting income tax savings. The court denied the petition without making any finding to support its action or assigning any reason for so doing. We are asked to reverse the judgment on the theory that the court's action constituted an abuse of discretion.

"Upon consideration of the petition for instructions filed herein by the substituted trustees with respect to the proposed conversion of capital stock of J.S. Tyree, Chemist, Inc., for debenture bonds of the same corporation, it is by the Court this 1st day of October, 1942, ordered that the said petition be, and the same hereby is, denied. . . ."

Under the circumstances it is impossible to determine why the trial court acted as it did. Presumably it had good reason for doing so. This is a case which illustrates the importance of the rule which requires the court to "find the facts specially and state separately its conclusions of law thereon * * *." The case will be remanded for this purpose.

Rule 52, Fed. Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; Rainey v. Rainey, 76 U.S.App.D.C. 341, 131 F.2d 349; Fogle v. General Credit, Inc., 71 App. D.C. 338, 110 F.2d 128. See Boss v. Hardee, 68 App.D.C. 75, 93 F.2d 234.

Reversed.


Summaries of

National Savings Trust Co. v. Shutack

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Dec 6, 1943
139 F.2d 371 (D.C. Cir. 1943)
Case details for

National Savings Trust Co. v. Shutack

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL SAVINGS TRUST CO. et al. v. SHUTACK et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Dec 6, 1943

Citations

139 F.2d 371 (D.C. Cir. 1943)

Citing Cases

Schilling v. Schwitzer-Cummins Co.

In such a situation as that of the present case, if adequate findings had not been made, the proper procedure…