holding that in lawsuit by twenty-two plaintiffs against twenty-seven defendants, it was appropriate to sever claims of seven plaintiffs against two particular defendants
Summary of this case from U.S. Football League v. Nat. FootballNos. 282, 391.
October 21, 1968.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Rufus S. Garrett, Jr., for petitioners in No. 282, and William Burrow for petitioners in No. 391. Reported below: 391 F. 2d 357.
holding that in lawsuit by twenty-two plaintiffs against twenty-seven defendants, it was appropriate to sever claims of seven plaintiffs against two particular defendants
Summary of this case from U.S. Football League v. Nat. FootballFull title:NATIONAL PLAN, INC., ET AL. v. CHURCH OF CHRIST OF ECORSE, MICHIGAN, ET…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 21, 1968
See Notes of Committee on the Judiciary, Senate Report No. 93-1277, Note to [Rule 801] Subdivision (d)(2)(E)…
Whiteside v. GillOn remand, the Hearing Examiner should review the record to determine whether the defendants sustained their…