National Machinery Co. v. Waterbury Farrel Foundry & Machine Co.

Full title: The NATIONAL MACHINERY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The WATERBURY…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 4, 1964

337 F.2d 944 (2d Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 101, Docket 28525.

Argued October 26, 1964.

Decided November 4, 1964.

H.F. McNenny, Cleveland, Ohio (John Hoxie, Harvey M. Brownrout and Davis, Hoxie, Faithfull Hapgood, New York City and D.W. Farrington and Richey, McNenny Farrington, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Willis H. Taylor, Jr., New York City (Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor Adams, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellees.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We find that patents 2,542,023 and 2,542,864 are invalid for lack of invention as set forth in the opinion of Judge Blumenfeld, reported at 221 F. Supp. 77, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.