Opinion
December 29, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In view of the various extensions of time which the court had already granted the defendant with regard to the completion of discovery and the defendant's failure to offer an acceptable excuse for his delay in completing the service of his discovery demands, we conclude that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion, which was based on the ground that his most recent discovery demands were outstanding (see, Tilden Fin. Corp. v Muffoletto, 161 A.D.2d 583). Mangano, P.J., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.