From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Vangas, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 11, 1969
413 F.2d 547 (9th Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 23429.

August 11, 1969.

Glen M. Bendixsen (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner.

Blaine Pettitt (argued), of Pettitt, Blumberg Sherr, Fresno, Cal., Le Prohn Le Prohn, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent.

Before CHAMBERS and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and POWELL, District Judge.


We find that the discharge of Allen Robins cannot be said to show any anti-union bias and cannot be said to be anything but the exercise of sound business judgment in a critical situation. Therefore, the proposed order will not be enforced.

Judge MERRILL would enforce.


Summaries of

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Vangas, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 11, 1969
413 F.2d 547 (9th Cir. 1969)
Case details for

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Vangas, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. VANGAS, INC., Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 11, 1969

Citations

413 F.2d 547 (9th Cir. 1969)