From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mays Printing Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 25, 2010
Case:2:10-mc-51089 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 25, 2010)

Opinion

Case:2:10-mc-51089.

October 25, 2010


ORDER


Upon consideration of the Application For Order Enforcing Subpoena Duces Tecum pursuant to Section 11 of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 161, I find that:

(1) The National Labor Relations Board's (Board) issuance of a subpoena duces tecum to procure evidence for the purpose of securing compliance with a Board Decision and Order and an Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Case 7-CA-51544, and administrative law judge's decision and order subsequently adopted by the Board in Case 7-CA-52247, is within the lawful jurisdiction of the government authority seeking sworn testimony and documents covered by the subpoena duces tecum;
(2) There is reason to believe that the testimony being sought is relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry; and
(3) There is reason to believe that Respondent's refusal to provide the sworn testimony and documents being sought will impede the unfair labor practice compliance proceedings in Cases 7-CA-51544 and 7-CA-52247 before the Board and is preventing the Board from carrying out its duties and functions under the Act.

Wherefore, it is ORDERED that Respondent's Keeper of the Records appear before the Board to provide documents and sworn testimony as requested in Subpoena B-573111.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated at Detroit, Michigan This 25 day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mays Printing Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Oct 25, 2010
Case:2:10-mc-51089 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mays Printing Co.

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Applicant, v. MAYS PRINTING COMPANY, INC…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 25, 2010

Citations

Case:2:10-mc-51089 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 25, 2010)