From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Labor Relations Bd. v. Ridge Tool Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 19, 1954
211 F.2d 88 (6th Cir. 1954)

Opinion

No. 11991.

February 19, 1954.

Geo. J. Bott, A. Norman Somers, Philip Fusco, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

R.F. Vandemark, Elyria, Ohio, for respondent.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.


The above cause, based on unfair labor practices and brought for enforcement of the order of the Board, was heard on the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel in open court. Counsel for respondent have ably contended that the record does not sustain the charge that respondent was guilty of the unfair labor practices charged. The testimony in support of the petitioner was strongly disputed; but we are of the opinion that, viewing the record as a whole, the findings of the Board are sustained by substantial evidence.

It is, therefore, ordered that the order of the Board be enforced.


Summaries of

National Labor Relations Bd. v. Ridge Tool Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 19, 1954
211 F.2d 88 (6th Cir. 1954)
Case details for

National Labor Relations Bd. v. Ridge Tool Co.

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. RIDGE TOOL CO

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 19, 1954

Citations

211 F.2d 88 (6th Cir. 1954)