From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Big Run Coal Clay

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 13, 1967
385 F.2d 788 (6th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 17149.

November 13, 1967.

Richard S. Rodin N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Richard S. Rodin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner.

Robert T. Caldwell, Ashland, Ky., for respondent.

Before EDWARDS, Circuit Judge, McALLISTER, Senior Circuit Judge, KENT, District Judge.

Honorable W. Wallace Kent, Chief Judge, United States District Court, Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.


ORDER

This is a petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board requiring the respondent to execute a contract with United Glass and Ceramic Workers of North America, ALF-CIO-CLC and Lexington Local No. 425. The company resisted the execution of the contract without a ratification by the members of the local union involved.

This case is controlled by the decision of this Court in Houchens Market of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, C.A. 6, 1967, 375 F.2d 208, and the cases therein cited.

It is ordered that enforcement of the order of the National Labor Relations Board be, and it is hereby granted.


Summaries of

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Big Run Coal Clay

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nov 13, 1967
385 F.2d 788 (6th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Big Run Coal Clay

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. BIG RUN COAL CLAY CO.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Nov 13, 1967

Citations

385 F.2d 788 (6th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & W Lektra Bat Co.

209 N.L.R.B. No. 165, (April 3, 1974). Upon consideration, the court concludes that the order of the Board is…

Adams Potato Chips v. National Labor Rel. Board

First, because the Company has no standing to challenge the validity of a union's ratification election. See…