From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Compactor Tech. v. Kohleriter Spandorf

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 26, 1976
38 N.Y.2d 933 (N.Y. 1976)

Opinion

Submitted January 16, 1976

Decided February 26, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, GEORGE F.X. McINERNEY, J.

Solomon M. Cheser and Leslie Kirsch for appellant.

William L. Maher and Gerald W. Jarrett for respondent.


Order reversed, with costs, the question certified answered in the negative, and the case remitted, pursuant to CPLR 5613, to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for the exercise of that court's discretion. Pleadings should be liberally construed, particularly in the case of claims over. A defendant seeking to claim over should not be obliged to anticipate what the proof will be in every detail under the pleading by the plaintiff pursued against that defendant.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.


Summaries of

National Compactor Tech. v. Kohleriter Spandorf

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 26, 1976
38 N.Y.2d 933 (N.Y. 1976)
Case details for

National Compactor Tech. v. Kohleriter Spandorf

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL COMPACTOR TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, INC., Respondent, v. KOHLERITER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 26, 1976

Citations

38 N.Y.2d 933 (N.Y. 1976)
382 N.Y.S.2d 985
346 N.E.2d 824

Citing Cases

Schmidt v. Magnetic Head

The determination sustaining the causes of action for reformation and rescission should also be upheld. True,…

National Compactor v. Kohleriter Spandorf

By order dated January 27, 1975, this court affirmed the order. On January 16, 1976 the Court of Appeals…