From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Broadcasting v. Fire Craft Ser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 2001
287 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

October 30, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered on or about October 12, 2000, which, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant-appellant John Gallin Son, Inc. seeking, inter alia, dismissal of plaintiff's claim for punitive damages, and granted plaintiff's cross motion for leave to serve a second amended complaint alleging, inter alia, a separate cause of action for punitive damages, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant defendant-appellant's motion insofar as to strike those portions of the second amended complaint seeking punitive damages as against it, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

James L. Fischer, for plaintiff-respondent.

Kenneth R. Feit, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Williams, Tom, Ellerin, Buckley, JJ.


This action arises out of property damage to plaintiff's premises as a result of fire caused by electrical failure, which occurred while defendant-appellant's subcontractor was performing construction work in the premises' elevators. Because dust produced by said subcontractor's drilling was capable of triggering the fire alarm system, the system was disabled by the company responsible for servicing it. Plaintiff alleges causes of action in contract and tort stemming from defendant-appellant's alleged failure to provide a fire watch for the period during which the alarm system was disabled.

Plaintiff's second amended complaint demands punitive damages against defendant-appellant for its negligent performance of the parties' contract. However, an award of punitive damages must be premised on conduct particularly egregious in nature directed both at the plaintiff and the general public (see,Rocanova v. Equitable Life Ins. Socy., 83 N.Y.2d 603), and it is plain that defendant-appellant's conduct, as alleged, negligent though it may have been, falls well short of this standard (see, Seynaeve v. Hudson Moving Storage, 261 A.D.2d 168).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

National Broadcasting v. Fire Craft Ser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 30, 2001
287 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

National Broadcasting v. Fire Craft Ser

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FIRE CRAFT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 30, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 722

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. Bd. of Managers of 260 Park Ave. S. Condo.

t 2014]). "Punitive damages are available in a tort action where the wrongdoing is intentional or deliberate,…

Shackman v. 400 E. 85th St. Realty Corp.

Specifically, the Court found that plaintiffs failed to establish that the defendant's conduct rose to the…