From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Bank of Northern New York v. Grasso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1980
79 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

December 23, 1980

Appeal from the Jefferson Supreme Court.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Jefferson County, for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant, the sole owner of Aquila's Pizza, Inc., a domestic corporation, opened a corporate checking account with plaintiff bank. In this action plaintiff seeks restitution for damages arising from its payment of a check issued by Aquila's Pizza, Inc. Following service of a summons and complaint by affixing a copy to the door of defendant's home and mailing (CPLR 308, subd 4) defendant did not appear and a default judgment was entered on November 14, 1977. While Special Term may have correctly ruled that defendant failed to make a requisite showing on its motion to set aside and vacate the default judgment pursuant to CPLR 5015, it erroneously failed to allow a defense to the action pursuant to CPLR 317. Defendant denied receipt of the summons and compaint or any knowledge of the action until after the issuance of a property execution subsequent to the entry of the default judgment. He made timely application under CPLR 317 and submitted facts showing a meritorious defense. Opening a default judgment is authorized under CPLR 317 "upon a finding of the court that [defendant] did not personally receive notice of the summons in time to defend and has a meritorious defense" (Marine Midland Bank v. Tooker, 78 A.D.2d 755). Personal delivery means "in-hand delivery" and a default judgment based upon any other form of service of the summons is subject to the ameliorative provisions of CPLR 317 (1 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac, pars 317.01, 317.02). Although requested, Special Term erroneously failed to treat defendant's application as a CPLR 317 motion and to direct a trial of the issue of fact as to whether defendant personally received notice of the summons in time to defend (CPLR 2218). The case is remitted for that purpose.


Summaries of

National Bank of Northern New York v. Grasso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1980
79 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

National Bank of Northern New York v. Grasso

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL BANK OF NORTHERN NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAVINO GRASSO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1980

Citations

79 A.D.2d 871 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Zuppa v. Bison Drywall Insulation Co., Inc.

The summons and complaint were delivered to the Secretary of State who forwarded them to defendant, but the…

Wells Fargo Bank v. Ghosh

Service under CPLR 308(2) is service "other than by personal delivery," and defendant Gill seeks to avail…