From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Bank of Canada v. Skydell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1992
181 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

March 31, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.).


Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3213 was properly denied for failure to provide sufficient time in the notice of motion for defendants to respond. (4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac ¶ 3213.02; see also, Ross Bicycles v Citibank, 149 A.D.2d 330, 331.)

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

National Bank of Canada v. Skydell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 1992
181 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

National Bank of Canada v. Skydell

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, Appellant, v. HARRY SKYDELL et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1992

Citations

181 A.D.2d 645 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 18

Citing Cases

Vladeck, Raskin, & Clark, P.C. v. Camme

Where, as here, defendants have not been provided with the statutorily required time in which to respond to a…

TD Bank, N.A. v. Excelsior Syndication of N.Y. LLC

Where, as here, defendants have not been provided with the statutorily required time in which to respond to a…