From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Natiello v. Natiello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 7, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Shaugnessy, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find that the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the husband's motion. The husband's delay of almost a year in bringing the matter to the court's attention supports a finding that the motion, which was made on the eve of trial, was made in bad faith, in order to delay the proceedings, or to secure a tactical advantage (see, Lucci v. Lucci, 150 A.D.2d 650, 652; Severino v. DiIorio, 186 A.D.2d 178, 180). Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Natiello v. Natiello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Natiello v. Natiello

Case Details

Full title:DOREEN P. NATIELLO, Respondent, v. THOMAS L. NATIELLO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
619 N.Y.S.2d 600

Citing Cases

The Credit Index, L.L.C. v. Riskwise Intl. L.L.C

Thus, in Alicea v. Bencivenga,supra, the First Department granted disqualification, stating: As the motion to…

Sganga v. Sganga

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court also providently exercised its discretion…