From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nathan v. Sussman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 26, 1955
285 App. Div. 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

April 26, 1955.

Present — Peck, P.J., Cohn, Breitel, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.; Cohn and Breitel, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm. Settle order on notice.


In our opinion plaintiff did not make a sufficient showing either that the parties had reached an agreement on all the essential terms and conditions of the proposed sale or that the buyer produced by plaintiff was ready, willing and able to carry out the terms of the proposed sale to warrant submission of the issue to a jury. Judgment reversed, with costs to the appellants, and judgment is directed to be entered in favor of the appellants dismissing the complaint herein, with costs.


Summaries of

Nathan v. Sussman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 26, 1955
285 App. Div. 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Nathan v. Sussman

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD NATHAN, Respondent, v. JULES SUSSMAN et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1955

Citations

285 App. Div. 1043 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)