From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Natalino v. St. Paul B. T. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 21, 1933
251 N.W. 669 (Minn. 1933)

Opinion

No. 29,899.

December 21, 1933.

Case followed.

Defendant appealed from a judgment of the district court for Dakota county, W.A. Schultz, Judge, in favor of plaintiff. Affirmed, following Natalino v. St. Paul B. T. Co. 190 Minn. 118, 251 N.W. 9.

D.L. Grannis and Barrows, Stewart, Jackson Junkin, for appellant.

Samuel A. Anderson and Keefe Fallon, for respondent.



Appeal from a judgment.

The case was here before and our opinion filed November 10, 1933, 190 Minn. 118, 251 N.W. 9. For the reasons given in the previous opinion and upon authority of that opinion, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.


Summaries of

Natalino v. St. Paul B. T. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 21, 1933
251 N.W. 669 (Minn. 1933)
Case details for

Natalino v. St. Paul B. T. Ry. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ORESTO NATALINO v. ST. PAUL BRIDGE TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Dec 21, 1933

Citations

251 N.W. 669 (Minn. 1933)
251 N.W. 669