From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat. U. Fire Ins. Co. v. J.M. Pontiac

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 12, 1990
571 So. 2d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-2273.

November 6, 1990. Opinion of October 3, 1989 Vacated and Withdrawn and Rehearing of Opinion on Rehearing Denied December 12, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ronald M. Friedman, J.

Merritt Sikes and William C. Merritt, Miami, for appellant.

Herzfeld and Rubin and Jeffrey B. Shapiro and Judy D. Shapiro, Miami, for appellee.

Before FERGUSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING


No error is shown in the court's determination, by final judgment, that from the face of the pleadings the appellant/insurer had a duty to defend. Accredited Bond Agencies, Inc. v. Gulf Ins. Co., 352 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). While it is clear that the complaint set forth alternative theories of liability, J.M. Pontiac has demonstrated that separate provisions of the policy provide coverage under any of the theories. The adjudication that National Union "must defend and indemnify Defendant, J.M. PONTIAC, Inc., for all causes of action set forth" in the complaint is correct.

In the absence of a responsive pleading to a cross-claim which states a cause of action, the court, after notice and a hearing, may enter a default judgment. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.500(b).

The summary judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Nat. U. Fire Ins. Co. v. J.M. Pontiac

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 12, 1990
571 So. 2d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Nat. U. Fire Ins. Co. v. J.M. Pontiac

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 12, 1990

Citations

571 So. 2d 512 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)