From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nastase v. Sanders

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Apr 15, 2010
Case No. C09-1138-RAJ (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. C09-1138-RAJ.

April 15, 2010


ORDER


Having reviewed defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 31), all responses, plaintiff's pending motions (Dkts. 35, 38, 39, 40), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Brian A. Tsuchida, the governing law, and the balance of the record, the Court does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
(2) Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and defendants are afforded judgment as a matter of law on all claims;
(3) Plaintiff's motions (Dkt. 35, 38, 39, 40) are DENIED;
(4) The Clerk of Court is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to Magistrate Judge Brian A. Tsuchida.

The cover letter accompanying the Report and Recommendation included the following statement: "Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal any order by the District Court adopting this report and recommendation." Although a failure to file objections may mean that an appellate court will not review certain issues, it is not a waiver of the right to appeal. See, e.g., Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1146-47 (9th Cir. 2007). A party wishing to appeal the court's judgment despite not objecting to the Report and Recommendations may disregard the quoted sentence in the cover letter.


Summaries of

Nastase v. Sanders

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Apr 15, 2010
Case No. C09-1138-RAJ (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Nastase v. Sanders

Case Details

Full title:LAURA MARY NASTASE, Plaintiff, v. BENJAMIN SANDERS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Apr 15, 2010

Citations

Case No. C09-1138-RAJ (W.D. Wash. Apr. 15, 2010)