From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nassau Insurance Company v. Riley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1980
73 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

January 28, 1980


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration under the terms of the uninsured motorist endorsement of a policy of insurance, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 6, 1979, which, upon an agreed statement of facts, (1) granted the cross motion for summary judgment of respondent Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO), (2) dismissed the petition, and (3) directed the petitioner to proceed to arbitration. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable to respondent GEICO. In our view, the text of the statement of financial security contained in respondent GEICO's notice of cancellation strictly complied with the statutory mandate set forth in subdivision 1 of section 313 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (cf. Judiciary Law, § 756). As this was the only issue submitted to Special Term for determination, the judgment should be affirmed. Hopkins, J.P., Damiani, Gulotta and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nassau Insurance Company v. Riley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 1980
73 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Nassau Insurance Company v. Riley

Case Details

Full title:NASSAU INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. SUSAN RILEY et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1980

Citations

73 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Nassau Ins. Co. v. Verdiner, Allstate Ins. Co.

The copy of the notice of cancellation sent by Popular Premium Plan, Inc., to Allstate sufficiently complied…