From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nash v. Zatecky

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Mar 6, 2015
1:13-cv-1876-SEB-TAB (S.D. Ind. Mar. 6, 2015)

Opinion

1:13-cv-1876-SEB-TAB

03-06-2015

TRANELL NASH, Petitioner, v. DUSHAN ZATECKY, Respondent.

Distribution: Tranell Nash No. 147576 PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Inmate Mail/Parcels 4490 West Reformatory Road PENDLETON, IN 46064 Electronically Registered Counsel


Entry Concerning Selected Matters

Pending before the Court are the petitioner's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and motion for certificate of appealability. Both motions are denied for the reasons explained below.

The petitioner seeks leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of the appellate fees of $505.00. An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915; see Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). "Good faith" within the meaning of § 1915 must be judged by an objective, not a subjective, standard. See id. At this time, there is no objectively reasonable argument the petitioner could present to argue that the disposition of this motion was erroneous. In pursuing an appeal, therefore, the petitioner "is acting in bad faith . . . [because] to sue in bad faith means merely to sue on the basis of a frivolous claim, which is to say a claim that no reasonable person could suppose to have any merit." Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026 (7th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, his appeal is not taken in good faith, and for this reason his request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [dkt. 30] is denied.

The petitioner's motion for the issuance of a certificate of appealability [dkt 32] is denied for the same reasons as explained in the Entry issued February 6, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

03/06/2015

/s/_________

SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana
Distribution: Tranell Nash
No. 147576
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Inmate Mail/Parcels
4490 West Reformatory Road
PENDLETON, IN 46064
Electronically Registered Counsel


Summaries of

Nash v. Zatecky

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Mar 6, 2015
1:13-cv-1876-SEB-TAB (S.D. Ind. Mar. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Nash v. Zatecky

Case Details

Full title:TRANELL NASH, Petitioner, v. DUSHAN ZATECKY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2015

Citations

1:13-cv-1876-SEB-TAB (S.D. Ind. Mar. 6, 2015)