Opinion
6:19-cv-885-RBD-DCI
07-28-2023
LINDA A. NASH; and RICHARD M. ANNETTE, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS; RICHARD B. ORFINGER; JUDGE WENDY W. BERGER; JAMES A. EDWARDS; BRIAN D. LAMBERT; and JAY P. COHEN, Defendants.
ORDER
ROY B. DALTON JR. United States District Judge.
The Court previously denied pro se Plaintiff Linda A. Nash's motion to reopen this very old closed case. (Doc. 29.) Nash then appealed (Doc. 30) and moved to appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 33 (“Motion”)). On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick entered a Report and Recommendation submitting that the Court should deny the Motion, as the appeal is frivolous. (Doc. 34 (“R&R”).) Nash objected to the R&R (Doc. 35 (“Objection”)), but like Nash's previous filings, the Objection is incoherent. So after a de novo review, the Court agrees entirely with Judge Irick's R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. The Objection (Doc. 35) is OVERRULED.
2. The R&R (Doc. 34) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order in its entirety.
3. Nash's Motion (Doc. 33) is DENIED.
4. Nash's earlier motion on the same grounds (Doc. 32) is DENIED AS MOOT.
5. The Court CERTIFIES that the appeal (Doc. 30) is not taken in good faith.
6. The Clerk is DIRECTED to notify the Eleventh Circuit of this Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4)(A), (B).
DONE AND ORDERED.