From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nash v. Sepitol

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Mar 19, 2010
04-CV-6089L (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2010)

Opinion

04-CV-6089L.

March 19, 2010


DECISION AND ORDER


This Court's Decision and Order (Dkt. #77) of November 14, 2008 dismissed most of plaintiff's claims. Only one claim remained and at a telephone conference with United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan W. Feldman on February 17, 2010, plaintiff was advised that he had two weeks to decide if he intended to proceed on the remaining claim. Magistrate Judge Feldman entered a Decision and Order (Dkt. #80) directing plaintiff to respond to that issue by March 5, 2010. By letter dated February 28, 2010, which was filed on March 9, 2010 (Dkt. #81), plaintiff summarized the affect of the Court's prior decision and confirmed that he did not wish to pursue the sole remaining claim.

Therefore, the complaint and the only remaining claim is dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nash v. Sepitol

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Mar 19, 2010
04-CV-6089L (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Nash v. Sepitol

Case Details

Full title:NEHEMIAH NASH, Plaintiff, v. STANLEY SEPITOL, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Mar 19, 2010

Citations

04-CV-6089L (W.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2010)