From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nash v. Duncan Park Comm'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 24, 2014
854 N.W.2d 721 (Mich. 2014)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 149168 149169. COA Nos. 309403 314017.

2014-10-24

Diane NASH, Personal Representative of the Estate of Chance Aaron Nash, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. DUNCAN PARK COMMISSION, Defendant–Appellant. Diane Nash, Personal Representative of the Estate of Chance Aaron Nash, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Duncan Park Trust, and Edward Lystra, Rodney Griswold, and Jerry Scott, Individually and as Trustees of the Duncan Park Trust, Defendants–Appellants.


Prior report: 304 Mich.App. 599, 848 N.W.2d 435.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issue whether the Duncan Park Commission constitutes “a district or authority authorized by law or formed by 1 or more political subdivisions; or an agency, department, court, board, or council of a political subdivision.” MCL 691.1401(e).


Summaries of

Nash v. Duncan Park Comm'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Oct 24, 2014
854 N.W.2d 721 (Mich. 2014)
Case details for

Nash v. Duncan Park Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:Diane NASH, Personal Representative of the Estate of Chance Aaron Nash…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Oct 24, 2014

Citations

854 N.W.2d 721 (Mich. 2014)
497 Mich. 884