Opinion
No. C-11-02795-CRB
10-18-2011
STEVEN ROBERT NARY, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Respondent.
STEVEN F. GRUEL Attorney for Steven Robert Nary STACEY D. SCHESSER Attorney for James D. Hartley
STEVEN F. GRUEL (CSBN 213148)
Attorney for Steven Robert Nary
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
PERMITTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S
MOTION TO DISMISS
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Respondent, by his attorney, Deputy Attorney General Stacey D. Schesser and the Petitioner, by his attorney, Steven F. Gruel, that the Petitioner, with the Court's permission, may have until November 29, 2011 to respond to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. This request is predicated on the fact that counsel for the Petitioner has an extremely pressing work schedule which includes finishing several opening briefs due in the next few weeks in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; several ongoing cases involving state and federal criminal prosecutions including prosecutions outside the Northern District of California. The Respondent does not oppose Petitioner's request for an extension of time to respond.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
STEVEN F. GRUEL
Attorney for Steven Robert Nary
STACEY D. SCHESSER
Attorney for James D. Hartley
[PROPOSED] ORDER
As stipulated above, the Petitioner's response to the Respondent's Motion To Dismiss shall be filed on or before November 29, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District