From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Narravula v. Perosphere Techs.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department
Aug 26, 2021
No. 2021-70842 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 26, 2021)

Opinion

2021-70842 Motion 533535

08-26-2021

THARUNIDHAR NARRAVULA et al., Individually and as Representatives of the Nominee, Appellants, v. PEROSPHERE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Respondents.


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Motion for order directing pro hac vice admission of Luke T. Cadigan, Esq., an attorney admitted in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the District of Columbia, pursuant to section 520.1 (a) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted, without costs, and Luke T. Cadigan, Esq., is admitted pro hac vice for the purpose of representing respondents upon the appeal.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Narravula v. Perosphere Techs.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department
Aug 26, 2021
No. 2021-70842 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Narravula v. Perosphere Techs.

Case Details

Full title:THARUNIDHAR NARRAVULA et al., Individually and as Representatives of the…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department

Date published: Aug 26, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-70842 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 26, 2021)