From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Narkin v. Logsdon

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg
Feb 1, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:07-CV-118 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 1, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:07-CV-118.

February 1, 2008


ORDER


On this day, the above-styled matter came before the Court for consideration of the plaintiff's Motion for a Request for an Attorney to Represent the Plaintiff [Doc. No. 14] and plaintiff's Motion for a Continuance [Doc. No. 15]. Plaintiff moves to have an attorney appointed to represent him pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and plaintiff also moves for more time to respond to the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 10] filed by defendant, Joseph France.

Upon review of the above, the Court does not find sufficient grounds to support the Motions. Accordingly, the Motion for a Request for an Attorney to Represent the Plaintiff is DENIED, and the Motion for a Continuance [Doc. No. 15] is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to all counsel of record herein and the pro se plaintiff.


Summaries of

Narkin v. Logsdon

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg
Feb 1, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:07-CV-118 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 1, 2008)
Case details for

Narkin v. Logsdon

Case Details

Full title:PAUL NARKIN, Plaintiff, v. MARILYN LOGSDON, ROBERT LOGSDON, and THOMAS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg

Date published: Feb 1, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:07-CV-118 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 1, 2008)