Summary
In Nardozzi v. Gooding (73 N.Y.S.2d 784, affd. 273 App. Div. 823) an attorney brought an action against a father for legal services rendered in the defense of a habeas corpus proceeding instituted by the father for the custody of his child, on the theory that such services were for the benefit of the child and thus constituted necessaries for which the father was liable.
Summary of this case from Gallin v. StaffordOpinion
January 26, 1948.
Order denying defendant's motion to compel plaintiff to reply to defendant's second and third affirmative defenses, and granting plaintiff's motion to strike out the second affirmative defense, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.