From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nard v. Ark. Dep't of Corr.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 20, 2024
3:24-CV-00170-BSM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 20, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-CV-00170-BSM

11-20-2024

JOSEPH NARD ADC #169524 PLAINTIFF v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

After de novo review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's recommended disposition [Doc. No. 4] is adopted. Joseph Nard's complaint [Doc. No. 1] is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and as frivolous, as such, his motion to appoint counsel [Doc. No. 5] is denied. Dismissal of this action in the future will be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g) and an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nard v. Ark. Dep't of Corr.

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 20, 2024
3:24-CV-00170-BSM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Nard v. Ark. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH NARD ADC #169524 PLAINTIFF v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 20, 2024

Citations

3:24-CV-00170-BSM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 20, 2024)