From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Narciso v. Cnty. of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Mar 8, 2022
21cv116-LL-MSB (S.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2022)

Opinion

21cv116-LL-MSB

03-08-2022

PATRICIA NARCISO, Individually and Through her Conservators MARCELINA LUNA and TRACY NARCISO, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SHERIFF WILLIAM GORE, DEPUTIES DONALD FRANK and DARSHAUN DOUGLAS, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER SETTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND VACATING PRETRIAL DATES

[ECF NO. 51]

Honorable Linda Lopez United States District Judge

Currently before the Court is the parties' joint motion for an order setting a revised briefing schedule on Defendants' motion for summary judgment, and vacating all pre-trial dates pending the Court's ruling the motion. ECF No. 51. In support, counsel for both parties state they have trials scheduled to begin in April 2022. Id. at 2. The motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion to extend the briefing schedule is GRANTED. Plaintiff's response to Defendants' summary judgment motion [ECF No. 49] is due by April 5, 2022. Defendants' reply is due by May 3, 2022. The hearing date for County Defendants' summary judgment motion is continued to May 10, 2022, although there will be no oral argument on this motion unless requested by the Court. The motion to vacate all pretrial dates pending the Court's ruling on motion for summary judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Narciso v. Cnty. of San Diego

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Mar 8, 2022
21cv116-LL-MSB (S.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Narciso v. Cnty. of San Diego

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA NARCISO, Individually and Through her Conservators MARCELINA LUNA…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

21cv116-LL-MSB (S.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2022)