From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naranjo v. Roe

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 10, 2003
84 F. App'x 764 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Argued and Submitted December 2, 2003.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Gary L. Taylor, District Judge, Presiding.

Joel Heredia Naranjo, COSP--3C Corcoran State Prison, Level 3 C Facility, Corcoran, CA, Phillip I. Bronson, Esq., Encino, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Michael C. Keller, Esq., AGCA--Office of the California Attorney General (LA), Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.


Before KOZINSKI, NOONAN, Circuit

Page 765.

Judges, and SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.

The Honorable William W. Schwarzer, United States Senior District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

ORDER

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

This case is remanded to the district court to assess whether petitioner Joel Heredia Naranjo satisfied the requisites in Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6) for reopening of the time to appeal the district court judgment entered on May 17, 2002.

REMANDED.


Summaries of

Naranjo v. Roe

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 10, 2003
84 F. App'x 764 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Naranjo v. Roe

Case Details

Full title:Joel Heredia NARANJO, Petitioner--Appellant, v. Ernest ROE, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 2003

Citations

84 F. App'x 764 (9th Cir. 2003)