From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naranjo v. Ivicic

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 15, 2022
3:21-CV-00072-CCW (W.D. Pa. Nov. 15, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-CV-00072-CCW

11-15-2022

ISAAC NARANJO, Plaintiff, v. M.M. IVICIC, D. J. CLOSE, and M.J. PYO Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

CHRISTY CRISWELL WIEGAND, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On November 1, 2022, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report, ECF No. 148, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, ECF No. 88, be denied on the grounds that Plaintiff requests injunctive relief against individuals who are not parties to this action and Plaintiff has failed to fully exhaust all available administrative remedies pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Service of the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) was made on the parties, and Plaintiff has filed Objections. See ECF No. 150.

After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the R&R and the Objections thereto, the following Order is entered:

Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, ECF No. 88, is DENIED; and the R&R, ECF No. 148, is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Naranjo v. Ivicic

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 15, 2022
3:21-CV-00072-CCW (W.D. Pa. Nov. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Naranjo v. Ivicic

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC NARANJO, Plaintiff, v. M.M. IVICIC, D. J. CLOSE, and M.J. PYO…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 15, 2022

Citations

3:21-CV-00072-CCW (W.D. Pa. Nov. 15, 2022)