From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Napper v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 25, 2010
2:09cv928 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. May. 25, 2010)

Opinion

2:09cv928 Electronic Filing.

May 25, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2010, after the plaintiff, Andrew Napper, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after cross-motions for summary judgment were filed by the parties, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the Chief United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until May, 17, 2010, to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Document No. 13] is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Document No. 9] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(I) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Napper v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 25, 2010
2:09cv928 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. May. 25, 2010)
Case details for

Napper v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW NAPPER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 25, 2010

Citations

2:09cv928 Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. May. 25, 2010)

Citing Cases

Pleacher v. Colvin

(Tr. 62). See Horodenski v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 215 Fed.Appx. 183, 189 (3d Cir. 2007);White v. Astrue,…