From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naposki v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2017
Case No. SA CV 16-00391 VBF (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. SA CV 16-00391 VBF (AFM)

03-07-2017

ERIC ANDREW NAPOSKI, Petitioner, v. D. ADAMS, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. Petitioner's objections are overruled.

The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted; and (2) Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. Dated: March 7, 2017

/s/_________

VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Naposki v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 7, 2017
Case No. SA CV 16-00391 VBF (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Naposki v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:ERIC ANDREW NAPOSKI, Petitioner, v. D. ADAMS, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 7, 2017

Citations

Case No. SA CV 16-00391 VBF (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 7, 2017)