From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Napier v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Mar 16, 2011
Civil No. 04-340-ST (D. Or. Mar. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 04-340-ST.

March 16, 2011

Tim D. Wilborn, Wilborn Law Office, P.C., Oregon City, Oregon, Attorney for Plaintiff.

Dwight C. Holton, United States Attorney, District of Oregon, Adrian L. Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, Carol A. Hoch, Social Security Administration, Office of General Counsel, Seattle, Washington, Attorneys for Defendant.


ORDER


The Honorable Janice M. Stewart, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on February 22, 2011. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation dated February 22, 2011 (#34) in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Approval of Attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (#30) is GRANTED in the sum of $9,533.97 from which the EAJA fee of $4,650.00 should be subtracted.

DATED this 16th day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

Napier v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Mar 16, 2011
Civil No. 04-340-ST (D. Or. Mar. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Napier v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE NAPIER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Mar 16, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 04-340-ST (D. Or. Mar. 16, 2011)