From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Napier v. Albrook

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Nov 7, 2023
Civil Action 21-cv-00746-CNS-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 7, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-cv-00746-CNS-MEH

11-07-2023

DUSTIN NAPIER Plaintiff v. LUKE ALBROOK Defendant

Counsel John Shoreman via VTC Heather Khulman Michael Lowe


Counsel John Shoreman via VTC Heather Khulman Michael Lowe

COURTROOM MINUTES

ORAL ARGUMENT

Court in Session: 3:00 p.m.

Appearance of counsel.

By stipulation, the Board of County Commissioners for Larimer County is no longer a defendant in this case.

ORDERED: Request by the defendant to supplement Exhibits C and E is GRANTED.

Argument as to [143] Defendant Albrook's Motion for Summary Judgment given by Mr. Lowe and Mr. Shoreman with questions from the Court.

The Court makes findings of fact, conclusions of law. As outlined on the record it is

ORDERED: [143] Defendant Albrook's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, judgment to enter after supplemental exhibits have been filed.

Court in Recess: 3:51 p.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in Court: 00:51


Summaries of

Napier v. Albrook

United States District Court, District of Colorado
Nov 7, 2023
Civil Action 21-cv-00746-CNS-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 7, 2023)
Case details for

Napier v. Albrook

Case Details

Full title:DUSTIN NAPIER Plaintiff v. LUKE ALBROOK Defendant

Court:United States District Court, District of Colorado

Date published: Nov 7, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 21-cv-00746-CNS-MEH (D. Colo. Nov. 7, 2023)