From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nano-Second Tech. Co. v. Dynaflex Int'l

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
CV 10-9176 RSWL (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

CV 10-9176 RSWL (MANx)

10-25-2011

NANO-SECOND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a Taiwanese Corporation Plaintiff, v. DYNAFLEX INTERNATIONAL, a California Corporation Defendant.


ORDER Re: Defendant Dynaflex International's

Ex Parte Application to Strike Plaintiff NanoSecond's Supplemental

Declaration and for Sanctions [50]

Before the Court is Defendant Dynaflex International's ("Defendant") Ex Parte Application to Strike Plaintiff Nano-Second's ("Plaintiff") Supplemental Declaration and for Sanctions [50]. Defendant requests that the Court strike a Supplemental Declaration that Plaintiff submitted four days before the Court's September 14, 2011 hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. This Supplemental Declaration, however, was not pertinent to the Court's analysis on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Accordingly Defendant's Ex Parte Application to Strike Plaintiff Nano-Second's ("Plaintiff") Supplemental Declaration is DENIED AS MOOT.

Furthermore, the Court DENIES Defendant's request for sanctions as the Court does not find that Plaintiff acted in bad faith in filing the Supplemental Declaration four days before the hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW

Senior, U.S. District Court Judge


Summaries of

Nano-Second Tech. Co. v. Dynaflex Int'l

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 25, 2011
CV 10-9176 RSWL (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Nano-Second Tech. Co. v. Dynaflex Int'l

Case Details

Full title:NANO-SECOND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a Taiwanese Corporation Plaintiff, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

CV 10-9176 RSWL (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)