From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Namm v. Levy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 14, 2019
172 A.D.3d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9301 Index 15825/16

05-14-2019

Florence NAMM, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Diana LEVY, et al., Defendants–Respondents, East 77th Realty LLC, et al., Defendants.

Zalman Schnurman & Miner, P.C., New York (Marc H. Miner of counsel), for appellant. Goldberg Segalla LLP, Garden City (Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for respondents.


Zalman Schnurman & Miner, P.C., New York (Marc H. Miner of counsel), for appellant.

Goldberg Segalla LLP, Garden City (Brendan T. Fitzpatrick of counsel), for respondents.

Richter, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Webber, Kern, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered on or about October 1, 2018, which, inter alia, granted the motion of defendants Diana Levy and Todd Levy for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly granted in this action where plaintiff alleges that she was injured when, while walking from the living room in defendants' apartment to the balcony, she tripped and fell on the step leading to the balcony. The evidence shows that there were no prior accidents or complaints about the step before plaintiff fell, and she testified that she did not look down at the threshold between the living room and the balcony, which required her to step down onto the balcony's floor (see Remes v. 513 W. 26th Realty, LLC, 73 A.D.3d 665, 903 N.Y.S.2d 8 [1st Dept. 2010] ). The opinion of plaintiff's expert that the balcony's step caused her optical confusion before the accident is belied by the photographs in the record that show a metal threshold and step that are shiny and clearly visible due to the fact that they are a lighter shade of gray than the balcony floor (see Hall v. New Way Remodeling, Inc., 168 A.D.3d 620, 92 N.Y.S.3d 39 [1st Dept. 2019] ; Franchini v. American Legion Post, 107 A.D.3d 432, 967 N.Y.S.2d 48 [2013] ).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Namm v. Levy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 14, 2019
172 A.D.3d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Namm v. Levy

Case Details

Full title:Florence Namm, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Diana Levy, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 14, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
98 N.Y.S.3d 426
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3732

Citing Cases

Goon v. Grand Cent. P'ship

Plaintiffs' submissions are, for the reasons outlined in the Court's denial of their motion for partial…

Derisi v. King Kullen Grocery Co.

Yet, Fein describes "the bumper" as a "rubber bumper," and determines that it extended approximately 4.5 to 6…