From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Name Intelligence, Inc. v. McKinnon

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 2, 2011
Case No. 2:10-cv-01202-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. May. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-01202-RCJ-GWF.

May 2, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Defendant Lachlin McKinnon's Response to Order to Show Cause (#55), filed April 27, 2011.

On April 19, 2011, this Court entered an order for Defendant McKinnon to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed because of Defendant's failure to obtain new counsel or advise the Court as to whether he would proceed pro se as ordered by the Court. (#52). In his response to this order, Defendant McKinnon states that he has recently obtained counsel and requests that sanctions not be imposed. (#55). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that sanctions will not be imposed and this matter shall proceed forward.


Summaries of

Name Intelligence, Inc. v. McKinnon

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 2, 2011
Case No. 2:10-cv-01202-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. May. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Name Intelligence, Inc. v. McKinnon

Case Details

Full title:NAME INTELLIGENCE, INC. and JAY WESTERDAL, Plaintiffs, v. LAUCHLIN…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 2, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:10-cv-01202-RCJ-GWF (D. Nev. May. 2, 2011)