From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nales v. Santaella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 3, 1980
73 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

January 3, 1980


Determination of the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated August 7, 1979, dismissing, sua sponte, the complaint on the ground that the New York State Division of Human Rights exceeded the statutory time limit for deciding the case, unanimously confirmed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. In circumstances similar to those presented here, we have already ruled that the time limit for determination of a complaint filed with the State division is directory rather than mandatory. (See Matter of Callaghan v. State Div. of Human Rights, 72 A.D.2d 679; see, also, Matter of Navarro v. State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 72 A.D.2d 680.) Accordingly, the complaint should not have been dismissed by the appeals board without a review of the merits. As in Callaghan (supra), we have, however, reviewed the merits and find that the division's dismissal of the complaint after hearing was supported by substantial evidence.

Concur — Birns, J.P., Fein, Sullivan, Markewich and Lynch, JJ.


Summaries of

Nales v. Santaella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 3, 1980
73 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Nales v. Santaella

Case Details

Full title:ROSA E. NALES, Petitioner, v. IRMA V. SANTAELLA et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 3, 1980

Citations

73 A.D.2d 851 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)