From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nakhal v. Nations Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 17, 2001
796 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-796

Opinion filed October 17, 2001

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; W. Herbert Moriarty, Judge; L.T. Case No. 99-21112 CACE (18).

William S. Isenberg of Latona Isenberg, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Frank P. Cuneo, and Juan A. Gonzalez of Liebler, Gonzalez Portuondo, P.A., Miami, for appellee.


Appellants sued appellee Nations Bank over a wire transfer that did not arrive in Damascus, Syria in time for a real estate closing. As a result, appellants forfeited their initial payment of $75,000. Even assuming the existence of an actionable tort not subject to the economic loss rule, the lost deposit damages were precluded by paragraph four of the wire transfer agreement with the bank which provided that "[i]n no event shall the Bank be liable for special, indirect, or consequential damages, including, without limitation, loss or damage from subsequent wrongful dishonor resulting from Bank's acts or omissions, except as may otherwise be provided by law." See generally § 670.305, Fla. Stat. (2000); U.C.C. Official Comments to section 670.305, Florida Statutes (2000).

AFFIRMED.

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nakhal v. Nations Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 17, 2001
796 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Nakhal v. Nations Bank

Case Details

Full title:ABEER NAKHAL and OMAR RAMADAN, Appellants, v. NATIONS BANK, a national…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 17, 2001

Citations

796 So. 2d 1281 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)