Opinion
19-81128-CIV-SINGHAL/MATTHEWMAN
09-23-2022
NAKAVA, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. THE SOUTH PACIFIC ELIXIR COMPANY, a Florida for Profit Corporation, Defendant.
ORDER
Raag Singhal, Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e) and Rule 60(b), filed on August 29, 2022 (the “Motion”) (DE [124]). “The only grounds for granting [a Rule 59] motion are newly-discovered evidence or manifest errors of law or fact.” Arthur v. King, 500 F.3d 1335, 1343 (11th Cir. 2007) (citations omitted). “A Rule 59(e) motion cannot be used to relitigate old matters, raise argument or present evidence that could have been raised prior to the entry of judgment.” Id. (citations omitted). That is precisely what Defendant seeks to do here. Defendant fails to point to newly discovered evidence or manifest errors of law or fact. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED Defendant's Motion (DE [124]) is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.