From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nakagawa v. Nakagawa

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Jan 24, 2003
25357 (Haw. Jan. 24, 2003)

Opinion

25357

January 24, 2003.

APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (FC-D NO. 00-1-1923)

MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, and ACOBA, JJ. and CIRCUIT JUDGE RAFFETTO, ASSIGNED BY REASON OF VACANCY


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Upon review of the record, it appears that (1) the supreme court clerk's office informed Appellant, by letter dated December 13, 2002, that the record on appeal cannot be filed without payment of the filing fee pursuant to Rule 3(f) of the Hawai`i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) or an executed motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to HRAP Rule 24 and that the matter would be called to the attention of the court for such action as the court deemed proper pursuant to HRAP Rule 11(a), including dismissal of the appeal; and (2) appellant failed to pay the filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis; therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Nakagawa v. Nakagawa

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Jan 24, 2003
25357 (Haw. Jan. 24, 2003)
Case details for

Nakagawa v. Nakagawa

Case Details

Full title:KRISTY KEIKO NISHIMURA NAKAGAWA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. PETER HISAO…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Jan 24, 2003

Citations

25357 (Haw. Jan. 24, 2003)