From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Naiman-Michaels v. Fisk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted September 8, 1999

October 18, 1999

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.).


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant made out a prima facie case that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d). However, the plaintiff's evidence submitted in opposition to the motion raised a triable issue of fact, and the Supreme Court properly denied summary judgment to the defendant (see, CPLR 3212[b]).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

BRACKEN, J.P., SANTUCCI, ALTMAN, FRIEDMANN, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Naiman-Michaels v. Fisk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Naiman-Michaels v. Fisk

Case Details

Full title:ELLEN NAIMAN-MICHAELS, Respondent, v. RICHARD A. FISK, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 702