From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nahme v. the City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 3, 1918
224 N.Y. 731 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued November 19, 1918

Decided December 3, 1918

William P. Burr, Corporation Counsel ( Terence Farley of counsel), for appellant.

Max Shlivek for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN, CARDOZO, POUND, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: CUDDEBACK, J.


Summaries of

Nahme v. the City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 3, 1918
224 N.Y. 731 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Nahme v. the City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ALMA NAHME, Respondent, v . THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 3, 1918

Citations

224 N.Y. 731 (N.Y. 1918)
121 N.E. 890

Citing Cases

National Ass'n for the Advancement v. Acusport, Inc.

Intervening actions between a defendant and the harm suffered by the public, even multiple or criminal…