From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nahapetian v. Espinoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 11, 2020
Case No. LACV 18-10701-VBF (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. LACV 18-10701-VBF (LAL)

03-11-2020

JIZETTE NAHAPETIAN, Petitioner, v. JANEL ESPINOZA, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.
DATED: March 11, 2020

/s/_________

HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nahapetian v. Espinoza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 11, 2020
Case No. LACV 18-10701-VBF (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2020)
Case details for

Nahapetian v. Espinoza

Case Details

Full title:JIZETTE NAHAPETIAN, Petitioner, v. JANEL ESPINOZA, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 11, 2020

Citations

Case No. LACV 18-10701-VBF (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2020)