Nagle v. Comedy Northwest, Inc.

Full title: William F. NAGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. COMEDY…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 6, 1997

113 F.3d 1242 (9th Cir. 1997)

Opinion

113 F.3d 1242 (9th Cir. 1997) William F. NAGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. COMEDY NORTHWEST, INC., Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. Nos. 94-36046, 94-36097. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit May 6, 1997

Submitted April 9, 1997. ^*

* Counsel for the appellant, Paul H. King, made a belated request to waive oral argument on the date set and did not comply with Ninth Circuit Rule 34(f). His failure to appear in Court was a disservice to his client and an imposition on opposing counsel.

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CV-93-01786-JCC; John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding.

W.D.Wash.

AFFIRMED.

Before: WRIGHT, REINHARDT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given in the court's Memorandum of Decision and Order filed August 25, 1994. The Motion to Strike Appellant's Reply Brief is granted, and the request for sanctions is denied.

AFFIRMED.

Although counsel did not comply with Ninth Circuit Rule 34(f), the panel unanimously found this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4.