From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nagim v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02973-WYD-KLM (D. Colo. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02973-WYD-KLM

10-04-2011

RONALD J. NAGIM, Plaintiff, v. RAY WALKER, and UNIVERSAL PERSONNEL, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's second "Motion to Show Cause" [Docket No. 62; Filed October 3, 2011] (the "Motion"). Although titled and docketed as a Motion, the pleading purports to inform the Court of the content of certain discovery responses received by Plaintiff. No relief is requested.

Plaintiff submitted a similar filing on July 25, 2011 [Docket No. 56] ("July 25, 2011 filing"). In the Minute Order denying the July 25, 2011 filing, the Court informed Plaintiff that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.5, discovery-related matters should not be filed on the docket unless relief is specifically being sought from the Court. The Court warned Plaintiff that future unnecessary pleadings may be summarily denied, stricken or ignored. Accordingly, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1H,

D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1H provides that "[a] verbose, redundant, ungrammatical, or unintelligible motion, response, or reply may be stricken or returned for revision, and its filing may be grounds for imposing sanctions."

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is STRICKEN.


Summaries of

Nagim v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 4, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02973-WYD-KLM (D. Colo. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Nagim v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:RONALD J. NAGIM, Plaintiff, v. RAY WALKER, and UNIVERSAL PERSONNEL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02973-WYD-KLM (D. Colo. Oct. 4, 2011)