From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nagim v. Suncor Energy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 13, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03363-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03363-BNB

01-13-2012

RONALD J. NAGIM, Plaintiff, v. SUNCOR ENERGY, Defendant.


ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTION

At issue is the Motion to Appeal that Mr. Nagim, a pro se litigant, filed with the Court on January 9, 2012. In the Motion, Mr. Nagim objects to Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland's January 4, 2012 Order that instructs him to submit his claims on a Court-approved form used in filing civil complaints and to show cause why he should not be denied leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

The Court will construe the Motion liberally as an Objection filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Under § 636(b)(1)(A), a judge may reconsider any pretrial matter designated to a magistrate judge to hear and determine where it has been shown that the magistrate judge's order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. For the reasons stated below, the Objection will be overruled.

Mr. Nagim's arguments are convoluted and provide no grounds for finding the January 4, 2012 Order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. To the extent Mr. Nagim requests that Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland recuse himself from this case, Magistrate Judge Boland has addressed this issue and denied Mr. Nagim's request. This Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Boland that nothing Mr. Nagim asserts in the Objection meets the objective standard for disqualification required pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). Magistrate Judge Boland is authorized to conduct the initial review in this case pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1.C.. Mr. Nagim's Objection, therefore, will be overruled. Mr. Nagim is instructed to comply with the January 4 Order or the action will be dismissed for failure to cure the deficiencies and to show cause. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Mr. Nagim's Motion to Appeal (Doc. No. 4), filed on January 9, 2012, is construed liberally as an Objection filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and is overruled. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Nagim has thirty days from the date of this Order to comply with the January 4, 2012 Order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that if Mr. Nagim fails to comply with the January 4, 2012 Order, as directed, the action will be dismissed without further notice.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 13th day of January , 2012.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Nagim v. Suncor Energy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 13, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03363-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Nagim v. Suncor Energy

Case Details

Full title:RONALD J. NAGIM, Plaintiff, v. SUNCOR ENERGY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 13, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03363-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 13, 2012)